Equity versus political suicide: framing the capital gains tax debate in the New Zealand print media.

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Barrett, J.
Veal, J.
Keywords
Capital gains tax
Income tax
Print media
Description of form
Publisher
Rights
Rights holder
Issue Date
2013-06
Peer-reviewed status
Type
Article
Language
en
Abstract
There is broad consensus among tax academics that capital gains should be included in a comprehensive income tax base. However, save for piecemeal measures to shore up gaps in the tax net, no party that has led a government in New Zealand had proposed a capital gains tax (CGT) before the Labour Party adopted it as policy in the run-up to the 2011 Election. From a theoretical perspective, the arguments for a CGT are relatively straightforward and the counterarguments are mainly political in nature or relate to the complexities of practical implementation. But how are these ideas communicated to voters? This article examines how the CGT debate was framed in the New Zealand print media between 1993 and 2011. The academic arguments – and overall academic support – for a CGT are firstly reprised. The framing methodology used is then outlined and key findings summarised. Findings of particular note are discussed further and conclusions drawn.
Citation
Barrett, J., & Veal, J. (2013). Equity versus political suicide: framing the capital gains tax debate in the New Zealand print media. New Zealand Journal of Taxation, Law and Policy, 19, 91-111.
DOI