Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarrett, J.
dc.contributor.authorStrongman, L.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-20T22:38:44Z
dc.date.available2013-11-20T22:38:44Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBarrett, J., & Strongman, L. (2013). Sovereignty in Postcolonial Aotearoa New Zealand: ambiguities, paradoxes, and possibilities. POLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 341-357.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11072/1605
dc.description.abstractThe Treaty of Waitangi, concluded between many Māori chiefs and the British Crown in 1840, is the foundational testament of Aotearoa New Zealand. Despite the constitutional character, its status, subject matter, and terms of the treaty are disputable. Legal positivists deny the validity of the treaty; the English text, but not the Māori version, supports cession of sovereignty despite the Māori probably not sharing the European conception of sovereignty. Such ambiguities and paradoxes obstruct categorical conclusions being drawn about sovereignty and the treaty. This article destabilizes and remystifies the positivist conception of Crown (state) sovereignty, rather than establishing illusory certainties about sovereignty in Aotearoa New Zealand. Stripped of its positivist certainties, sovereignty, on a day-to-day basis, may be seen to concern the ways self-determining peoples protect, preserve, and develop their cultures. Viewed in this light, sovereignty in Aotearoa New Zealand cannot plausibly be claimed by one particular culture; therefore, other solutions must be considered.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSovereigntyen
dc.subjectTreaty of Waitangien
dc.subjectIndigenous constitutionsen
dc.titleSovereignty in Postcolonial Aotearoa New Zealand: ambiguities, paradoxes, and possibilities.en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record