Risky business – the ethics of judging individuals based on group statistics.

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Scholes, V.
Issue Date
2016
Type
Book chapter
Language
en
Keywords
Applied ethics , Organisations , Decision-making
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Alternative Title
Abstract
This paper analyses the ethics of organisations assessing applicants based on group risk statistics. For example, parole boards consider information predicting recidivism risk; insurance companies calculate the risk that an insured will make a claim; and employers want to minimise the chance of selecting lower-productivity employees. This paper explores organisational rejection of applicants from risky groups as a form of discrimination to help identify the distinct ethical implications for applicant autonomy from the use of group risk statistics. Contra Schoeman (1987) and Schauer (2003), this paper argues there is a substantive difference between assessing applicants directly through group statistics rather than including ‘individualised’ evidence. This difference impacts on the agency of applicants in the process. The paper concludes with recommendations for how to bolster applicant agency when using risk statistics to assess applicants.
Description
Citation
Scholes, V. (2016). Risky business – the ethics of judging individuals based on group statistics. In M. Grix and T. Dare (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Applied and Professional Ethics (pp. 169–188). Emerald. doi:10.1108/s1529-209620160000015010
Publisher
Rights
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
EISSN
Collections