A comparison of two online learning systems
No Thumbnail Available
Open Access Location
Authors
Nichols, M.
Keywords
Distance education
iQualify
Online education
iQualify
Online education
Description of form
Publisher
Rights
Rights holder
Issue Date
2016
Peer-reviewed status
Type
Article
Abstract
Open Polytechnic is a single-mode provider of distance education with a rich history of
print-based provision. Strategically, the institution is rapidly adopting an online-only
approach, with some exceptions for programmes that require student contact. A recent and internal review of Moodle, the Open Polytechnic’s learning management system (LMS) indicated concern about the likely student experience for an online-only format, so an internal system called iQualify was developed. iQualify was developed specifically from a user-experience (UX) perspective to optimise the online-only learning experience. As part of the drive towards online-only education, Open Polytechnic courses are being purposefully redeveloped for iQualify, moving away from print-and textbook-based materials, and towards textbook-independent and online-only study. This article uses a UX perspective to compare student outcomes, high-level course evaluations, and student perceptions of the two approaches—Moodle, with print and textbook; and iQualify online-only. Findings indicate that while students tend to prefer printed materials, actual withdrawal and pass rates are not affected by an online-only approach. Respondents also indicated a significant preference for the new iQualify platform over Moodle, and openness to online-only study.
Citation
Nichols, M. (2016). A comparison of two online learning systems. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 20(1), 19–32. Retrieved from http://www.jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/257/199